Showing posts with label YouTube. Show all posts
Showing posts with label YouTube. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 5, 2025

Book Review: "Baking Yesteryear", by B. Dylan Hollis



Food media has done some Weird Shit in its time- this is known. But the notion of short form cooking with unusual or unexpectedly interesting recipes is about as common and timeless as it gets (or as much so as the internet gets, at least). That said, carving out a niche of one's own while doing something comparatively common is not easy, requiring a vast amount of luck, charisma, and apparently hair gel. 

Friends would reliably send me little clips of this fellow B. Dylan Hollis. I believe my first experience was "Ice Cream Bread", which I thought about for a second and went "Oh, it's going to end up like pound cake!" before hitting play  (I was right, for the record, and it's a pretty good one.) I looked with care, considered the source, and made a point to take notes on any of them I happened to see. Because it might be a gimmick, but it's a solid gimmick.

Random and/or retro recipes are inevitably a roll of the dice- something I know all too well, having no small amount of the same sorts of cookbooks he pulls from for many of his clips, and for much the same reasons. No small part of the fun of those recipes (and in this case watching him) is wondering of what's actually going to happen, and his endearing boyish charm more than covers the rest. He's the strawberry mimosa sort of twink whose hair I want to muss, then grin at the petulantly frazzled result before I pull him onto the couch to cuddle and watch a movie. If he happens to read this... blush away, kid.

But this is less about his online presence and more about his first book. Not too long before his second one will come out (it's due in May of this year) I decided to pull Baking Yesteryear from the library's shelf and give it a proper look. Yes, I'm a little late to the party, but that's the usual for a poverty-stricken professional like me. Besides, it's not like the recipes are new! Everything in the book is 20th century, and cuts out in the 80s somewhere. There's no real rush- they'll keep a little longer!

The intensity and enthusiasm Hollis has for desserts comes through in near every sentence of the book as readily as it does in his innumerable cooking and baking video clips. In his own words: "it dawned on me that each recipe writer was, in their own way, simply trying to share something that made them feel good... the sharing of a dessert and how to make it was an exercise in sharing happiness." It has the ring of truth to it, and contrived or not, brand or not, it's delightfully charming and as endearing as can be. 

His mien is more or less 'Favorite Grandson goes through Grandma's cookbooks as saucily as if he were a guest on The Golden Girls'. So... me, with more glitter and pizazz but far less precision and expertise. He himself also notes “I’ve often said I’m perhaps one of the only well-known food creators on the internet who hasn’t a clue what he’s doing”.

...I had to pause for a moment there and just laugh. 

And laugh and laugh and laugh. 

Such a dear sweet innocent boy. Small wonder his earnest words ring true!

Before the culinary trip through time begins though, there's a note or two. The recipes break from modern convention and call for salted butter unless otherwise specified. Recall that refrigeration is a 20th century thing, and remained somewhat rare till midcentury. Given butter's consistent expense, it was commonly sold salted to ensure longer shelf life. 

Hollis also hedges his bets here by offering terminology, common ingredients, measurement conversions, and his default cookie scoop (It's a #60, if you were wondering. Mine's a #50- I like them a little bigger.) as well as a superlative pie crust recipe and a basic vanilla buttercream frosting. Those last two likely in case some of the potential components of the recipes as written seem a touch too intimidating or equipment-prohibitive (Not everyone owns a candy thermometer or stand mixer, after all!). He mentions by name the Boiled Frosting, which sounds equal parts complicated and outlandish until you read it- it's basically just Swiss Meringue. Tricky, yes, but not outlandish at all. 

Baking Yesteryear's recipes go through most of the 20th century, decade by decade beginning with the 1900s. Every decade begins with no small amount of stage-setting, sprinkled with personal anecdotes, historical miscellany, and other cleverness to keep you reading and put you in the proper frame of mind for the time and place. Each is as unique as the recipes and circumstances from which they came, and read hungrily.

There are three sections that aren't decades though.

Dates: Something he adores but never seems to get enough of.

No-Bake: Because there were enough of them to justify a separate category.

Worst of the Worst: Explains itself, really. Whooooooo boy.

Bereft of ego, I'm probably one of the best possible people to review this sort of book. I know exactly what Dylan's talking about, where it's coming from, where his approach is coming from, and how to approach it. On every relevant level I understand the subtext- including how to jumble subtext right.

For someone who didn't do food for a living until now, he did a damn fine job with this book. The recipes are clear, succinct, and none too complicated. The concept is sound, the execution stellar, and the voice underneath as clear as can be. It's a good solid read that takes a lot of old things and brings them out of mothballs into the light again. It might not be everyone's cup of tea, and it's not the most useful as a practical cookbook, but as a compiled reference text, coffee table book, and way to get in touch with Grandma, it's a fine work indeed.

Monday, December 19, 2022

Why Representation Has Requirements: Screw You Uncle Roger

    Rapid improvement in international and global communication has led to all manner of improvements in understanding between people, places, and cultures otherwise far apart and dissimilar. However, the rapid spread of information and ideas also brings its inevitable baggage along: misinformation, stereotype, and caricature. 

    Which brings us to my memetic headache of the moment: Uncle Roger. His comedic gimmick is pretty simple- leaning into the middle aged Asian Uncle who behaves like a FOB despite being far from 'home' for many years. Take this, turn the accent up to 11, add gratuitous overreactions to a variety of situations, including many video clips of Asian cooking by non-Asians, and you pretty much have it down.

    The enterprise is not wholly without merit. Some of the examples used in his videos are legitimately appalling, and the reactions would be the same from just about anyone, irrespective of their background.  (Making 'fried rice' with raw, uncooked rice? Yikes.)

    When he turns the clowning on professionals though, it gets rather more bothersome. His targets sometimes seem cherry-picked. Influential, largely wealthy veterans of the food media world occasionally publicize things far outside their area of expertise. 

    The former part of that is Uncle's armor- any angry response would come across as ego driven and 'punching down', so the latter part's often valid criticism has time to sink in. There are occasional counter-reactions from those targeted by the dramatic 'Aiyah!', but it feels like there's a lot of smiling done with clenched jaws and gritted teeth.

    That in itself isn't even so bad, but what's underneath is a more subtle kind of damage that bothers me very much indeed. 

Consider: 

I am the Whitest Dude You Probably Know- I look like a mix of Daniel Radcliffe and Peter Parker. I'd probably be a prime target for a Fried Rice Reaction Video if my media presence were larger. 
But you know what? 

(admiral_ackbar_its_a_trap.jpg)

I'm a chef that specializes in the food culture of Asia and Southeast Asia. I know everything Uncle Roger talks about when it comes to food- what's true, what's exaggerated, and what's outright nonsense. I've spent years living and working alongside both the people he mimics and the ones he griefs.
    
    The stereotype shorthand used by Uncle Roger to influence believability and legitimacy takes away from those who have the expertise, but not the look. Seen most commonly in 'ethnic' restaurants here in the West, hiring practices are geared to give customers what they expect to see. While far fewer than in years past, plenty of people still want to see their very own Uncle Roger when they go out for Chinese- and that's simply not a good thing. 

    Well-meaning as the entertainment might be, it inadvertently causes backsliding of the gains made in Asian media representation, and it undermines the more universal effort to move past stereotypes and preconceptions of knowledge or experience. 

    The days of Short Round and Yan Can Cook are decades gone by, and the Asian communities around the world are better for it. Why draw from a manufactured subculture proven to be harmful, and that's in the process of being deliberately phased out? Uncle Roger feels firmly in the territory of "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.".

    The goal should be to judge the content of the craftsmanship, not the color of the culinarian.

-Awoo.